CCMH 565 Wk 2 Discussion – Comparing Theoretical Approaches to Family Therapy

0 items
CCMH 565 Wk 2 Discussion - Comparing Theoretical Approaches to Family Therapy
CCMH 565 Wk 2 Discussion – Comparing Theoretical Approaches to Family Therapy
$3.00
Go to the store page
  • Description

CCMH 565 Wk 2 Discussion – Comparing Theoretical Approaches to Family Therapy

Post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to classmates or your faculty member.

Due Thursday

It’s never too early to begin defining your perspective on family counseling approaches you would like to use in your own practice. Reflecting on what you have learned about the differences between Bowenian, Strategic, and Structural approaches to family therapy will help you become well-versed in each strategy and also assist you in determining which suits you best

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

  • Which theoretical approach from this week’s chapter readings resonates with you the most? How does it align with your desired approach to family therapy?

  • What are some advantages to using this approach?

  • What challenges do you anticipate in using this approach?

  • Where possible, support your answer with relevant details and/or examples.

  • Propose a couple or family clinical issue that can be addressed with the theory of your choice.

  • What specific intervention(s) from your chosen theory would be effective in addressing the issue? Note: Refer to the Week 2 assigned readings as needed.

  • Where possible, support your answer with relevant details and/or examples.

Due Monday

Post 2 replies to classmates or your faculty member. Be constructive and professional.