- Description
CJA/305
The Latest Version A+ Study Guide
**********************************************
CJA 305 Entire Course Link
https://hwsell.com/category/cja-305/
**********************************************
CJA 305 Week 1 Criminal Law Paper
Resource: Lexis Uni Supreme Court Research Search
Locate a recent, within the last 10 years, criminal United States Supreme Court decision you find interesting in the LexisNexis library.
Provide a brief summary and properly cite the case.
Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper in which you answer the following questions:
- What interested you about this case?
- What are the sources, purposes, and jurisdictions of the criminal law related to this case?
- What is the difference between the various elements of crime, including actus reus, mens rea, and concurrence? Describe which element(s) of crime were related to this case.
- What is the adversarial system and how was it applied in this case? (For example, what was the argument from the prosecution, and what was the argument from the defense?)
- Define inchoate crimes, and describe if there were any inchoate crimes in your chosen case.
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment
CJA 305 Week 2 Criminal Defense Case Analysis
Resource: Lexis Uni Supreme Court Research Search
Sign in to the Lexis Uni website and navigate to the Criminal Justice Home page. Under “Recent Supreme Court Decisions”, click on “View all Supreme Court Decisions for Criminal Justice”. Then, narrow your search by “violent crimes”
Locate two U.S. Supreme Court cases that discuss various types of criminal defenses.
Write a 700- to 1,050-word case analysis in which you identify and examine the types of criminal defenses that were used. Include the following:
- Explain the nature and types of defenses used in the cases. What evidence was used to demonstrate the defense?
- Explain the similarities and differences between justification and excuse. Describe how justification and excuse play a role in the cases.
- Describe the outcome of each case.
Format your case analysis consistent with APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
CJA 305 Week 2 Prosecuting Argument Outline
Each LT will prepare an outline for the week 3 Learning Team assignment. The outline should include the specific subject(s) or areas of responsibility that each member of the LT will be responsible for. The outline should also include the time and date each team member is to submit their portion of the LT assignment. In setting deadlines for the submission of individual work, the Learning Team should make sure to include sufficient time to allow for editing and proofreading before the assignment is due.
CJA 305 Week 3 Personal, Property, and Computer Crimes Analysis
Read the instructions in the University of Phoenix Material: Personal Crimes Analysis document and select one of the following options to complete the assignment.
Choose from the following options:
- Option 1: Personal Crimes Analysis Presentation
- Option 2: Personal Crimes Analysis Matrix
- Option 3: Personal Crimes Analysis Posterboard
Format your submission consistent with APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
CJA 305 Week 3 Prosecuting Argument Paper
Resource: University of Phoenix Material: State v. Stu Dents document
Discuss the case of State v. Stu Dents. Your team will present both the prosecuting team and defense team arguments in this paper.
Write a 1,250 to 1,500-word paper that details the team’s argument and is to include:
Defense arguments:
- Does your team feel this defendant is competent to stand trial? Why or why not?
- Distinguish between competency to stand trial and an insanity defense.
- What is required in your state for an insanity defense?
- What steps must be taken to prove insanity?
Prosecutor arguments:
- List the elements of each crime and facts that establish each element.
- Provide a specific law for each charge. Each team member’s state needs to be represented.
- Select the state where your case would be the strongest
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
CJA 305 Week 4 Anti-Drug and Public Order Crime
Resource:Lexis Uni Supreme Court Research Search University Library, the Internet, University of Phoenix Material: Anti-Drug Legislation document.
Complete the University of Phoenix Material: Anti-Drug Legislation Matrix.
Submit your assignment to the Assignment Files tab.
CJA 305 Week 4 Sentencing Proposal Outline
Each Learning Team will prepare an outline for the week 5 Learning Team assignment. The outline should include the specific subject(s) or areas of responsibility that each member of the LT will be responsible for. The outline should also include the time and date each team member is to submit their portion of the LT assignment. In setting deadlines for the submission of individual work, the Learning Team should make sure to include sufficient time to allow for editing and proofreading before the assignment is due.
CJA 305 Week 5 Victims and Crime Evaluation
Resources: Lexis Uni Supreme Court Research Search, University Library, the Internet.
Use relevant cases and statutes you have researched in Lexis Uni throughout the course.
Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper that describes roles and functions of individuals in the criminal justice system and how victimization affects each role.
Evaluate the roles of prosecutor, defense attorney, criminal, and victim.
Summarize how victimization affects each role.
Answer the following questions:
- What are the goals of sentencing associated with each role?
- What are the goals of alternative sanctions?
- What recommendations do you have regarding victims’ rights?
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
CJA 305 Week 5 Sentencing Proposal
Resource: University of Phoenix Material: Ruling on State v. Stu Dents.
Write a 1,250- to 1,500-word proposal that includes two different sentencing arguments formulated by your team. One sentencing proposal is from the prosecution, and one sentencing proposal is from the defense.
Include the desired outcome of each punishment. Is a plea bargain a consideration? If so, what is that desired outcome?
Include alternative and intermediate sanctions.
Explain how the eighth amendment influences the outcomes of this case.
Include a 5- to 10-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation with your proposal.
Format your paper and presentation consistent with APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.